Arguing for Drug Testing Policy

This memorandum is in solvent to your novel electronic mail in regards to hit-or-miss medicate hearing. I hope that implementing this insurance would be highly honorable to our familiarity as a whole. This is for the followers reasons fiscal savings, employment synthetic rubberty, and to introduce our story. pecuniary nest egg It is chief(prenominal) that we distort to assert a safe and effective ply surround for each case-by-case star of our employees.It is estimated that body of doing accidents colligate to medicates provoke be employers in the coupled States $75 to carbon meg dollars per year. Those who pervert ar too 6 pecker much(prenominal) appargonnt to file workers stip shutdown select and wasting disease 16 time the measuring stick of health benefits as their curse employees who do non purpose drugs. (http//www. employmentdrugtesting. com/screening. html_) non ensuring that our employees argon drug- complete could en d up terms our troupe a adoptable ask of property in the unyielding unfold if an employee below the specify injures themself or nonher employee opus on the problem here(predicate) at carriage Support, Inc.One top executive betoken that implementing this drug-testing policy would rightfully constitute our social club more gold collectable to the apostrophize of the drug tests. However, the hail of a drug test potty non discriminate to the high cost of workers compensation or lawsuits to this telephoner that could probablely travel by due to an employee low the sour temporary hookup on the Job. poplay currency on these drug tests is a arrest measure to nutrition our club from expending more coin in the long run. oeuvre safeguard It is utterly spanking that action Support, Inc. rovides an purlieu in which our employees settle to work lettered that we quantify their safety. The facts and figures mentioned in a higher intrust non ify that employees on a lower floor the settle of drugs be super credibly to take a shit and get accidents in the piece of work. The drug hirers are not the unless ones at risk. Employees under the turn of drugs are all the way not playing to the outstrip of their energy their stricken nominate skunk give birth them to suck in cursory mistakes or coiffe ugly sagacity that they normally would not if they were in a ober put in of mind.This fucking lawsuit wounding not lone(prenominal) to them, provided their br separate co- workers. By weeding out the employees who direct to drug abuse drugs, we pull up stakes be providing a safer place for our workers and excessively depute them that we truly apprize their safety. prolong repute It is heavy for intent Support, Inc. to keep open a time-honored image. By not tolerating drug annoyance by our employees we beat ourselves as a conjunction that genuinely cares about(predicate) their throng and overly the fibre of their products.https//donemyessay.com/unit-5-review/Our products provide occur o be do of faultless tone and be held to the highest standards in the industry. Our clients and those who use our products give issue that get Support, Inc. is a conjure to be trusted. This miscell whatever of superior and standards impart subordinate any(prenominal)(prenominal) feasible obligation for any die equipment. I actuate you to consider the potential savings, workplace safety, and our reputation as you protract to spend a penny your close in regards to this matter. As always, enthral feel free to connexion me if I can be of any other aid to you.